Wednesday, September 18, 2019
Contrasting Principles of Classical and Operant Conditioning Essay
       Learning is a very important part of Psychology and it has been     defined as ââ¬Ëany relatively permanent change in behaviour, or behaviour     potential, produced by experienceââ¬â¢ (Baron, p.169). Learning is a key     process in human behaviour; it can play an important role in most of     the activities we do.       Even though the effects of learning are extremely diverse, most     psychologists believe that learning occurs in several basic forms:     conditioning ââ¬â classical and operant and observational learning.       Myers defined conditioning as ââ¬Ëthe process of learning associationsââ¬â¢.       Classical conditioning is where the stimulus serves as a signal for     the occurrence of a second stimulus. (Learning to associate two     stimuliââ¬â¢s together). In classical conditioning we are able to acquire     information about the relations between various stimuli and not just     simple associations between them.       The most famous research for classical conditioning comes from Ivan     Pavlov in 1927.       During Pavlovââ¬â¢s research into salivary secretion in dogs he noticed     that when he put food into a dogââ¬â¢s mouth it would salivate. He then     found that if he worked repeatedly with the same dog it would salivate     to stimuli associated with food such as the sight of food, the food     dish or the presence of the person who brought the food.       Because of what Pavlov found he then chose to study learning, which he     hoped might enable him to better understand what was happening.       Pavlov and his assistants began work by pairing various neutral     stimuli such as sound when food was present in the dogââ¬â¢s mouth to see     if the dog would eventually learn to salivate to the just the sound on     itââ¬â¢s own.    ...              ...viour due to a reinforcer and     are only likely to show the desired behaviour if itââ¬â¢s reinforced and     so this behaviour is unlikely to be a permanent change compared to     classical conditioning which has much high chances of remaining.           Bibliography       Carlson, N. R., Buskist, W., & Martin, G. N. (2000). Psychology: The     Science of Behaviour. London: Allyn & Bacon.       Myers, D.G. (2003) Psychology. (Seventh Edition). Michigan: Worth     Publishers.       Ferguson, K. E., Oââ¬â¢Donohue, W. (2001). The Psychology of B.F Skinner.     London: Sage publications.       Bjork, D.W. (1997) Skinner- A Life. London. American Psychological     Association.       Hall, G. (1983). Behaviour ââ¬â An introduction to Psychology as a     Biological science. London: Academic Press inc.       Baron, R. A. (1998) Psychology. (Fourth Edition). London: Allyn &     Bacon                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.